Kinda silly, no. Yes those problems are NP-hard but you don't actually have to solve them.
mkarrer joined the channel
oakpacific
waxwing: he said it in the end
waxwing
pfft, you think i read all the way to the end ? :)
moo-_-, oakpacific , dansmith_btc are you around?
dansmith_btc
i am
waxwing
i suddenly realised as i'm editing the diagram, i don't think we should have the arrow to the left with 'server mac key' on the auditor line
it's this whole thing of trying to explain, although each side has half the starting secret, it's not true that we split the actual ssl keys. auditor has nothing, right.
damn, it's hard to draw this in a way which is both simple and correct...
dansmith_btc
this diagram is just a simplification/approximation of the process, it was not intended to be describing the process correctly. I will ACK anything that you wanna throw at it including colored arrows.
waxwing
right dansmith_btc . but, what bothers me is when the diagram can be unambiguously interpreted to mean something which would make the protocol completely unsound.
for example, in the absence of arrows showing the commitment, the auditee could fake the traffic.
and in the case of the auditor possessing the server mac key, the auditor could fake the traffic (would be hard, but still)
but fine, i'll just get on with it and try to thread the needle between simple and correct.
dansmith_btc
in that case just add any extra boxes you feel like adding. We will still thank moo-_- for the initial drawing. If you feel that simplification would lead to unsoundness then add as much extra stuff as needed to make it look sound.
oakpacific
I would be more than happy if anyone conducts a thorough enough review that he raises such questions
moo-_-
waxwing: ping
oakpacific
a little bit of turmoil and noise helps with the publicity
waxwing
no, sorry i can't agree. put yourself in their position. the *first* thing you do with your limited time is look at the protocol diagram to gauge its soundness. if there's a massive hole in it, it's going to turn them off.
moo-_-, pong, obviously :)
oakpacific
waxwing: i don't think anyone who could see that hole will make a knee-jerk response tbh
especially when we make it clear that this is for j6p consumption
other than that maybe the status of the white paper should be promoted to a similar level
i suggest
rather than trying to figure out what we should put in the diagram
let's first figure out what we shouldn't
i have another idea, but it's a bit more complex
let's say, we paint the textboxes in different colors, in levels of significance
waxwing
oh so dansmith_btc , now i've finished my edits, squashed my commits, and the last step of step 2 is 'git push origin master', so i'm actually going to merge. i was more thinking of how i could edit the PR, and then keep it as an open PR. This is what i was confused about; presumably that is, indeed, impossible.
oakpacific, i'm going to upload a version in a minute. there's nothing saying it can't change again.
oakpacific, "posted by Cesar" - is that a clever pun? :)
oakpacific
waxwing: lol just noticed
waxwing
oakpacific, you just hit one of those regular reddit pockets of idiocy
oakpacific
had something like Alipay available in the West, Bitcoin would seem way less superior
waxwing
maybe from some perspectives, but not mine. bitcoin is not ease of payment. it's freedom of payment/transfer, big difference.
oakpacific
yeah what did you tell me last time? "you are special" or "you are unique"? :)
waxwing
i don't think i'm unique on that score.
i seem to be in the minority on some other things. i forget what now :)
oakpacific
i think at least 80% of the people out there trust CC, all of whose lives I consider to be kept going by self-denial :)
you don't even need cryptographic signature to make it so easy for the thieves, you know
every merchant accepts you payment can access all your CC equivalent of private keys, this is astonishingly archaic
even more archaic than online-banking with SSL 2.0
waxwing
you're preaching to the choir :)
oakpacific
waxwing: well if the people valuing ease of payment way over freedom of payment is not the majority i can't understand why such a system is kept in place for so long
waxwing
who said it wasn't the majority? i just said i'm not unique, i didn't say i'm not in the minority
oakpacific
also over anything else
waxwing
i mean it's pretty obvious where the majority lies there
oakpacific hates going over nuances especially when the price is falling
Yet Another Idea re: diagram. Use a different colour for those ~ 4 boxes which are different to normal TLS. Then it's easier to see how tlsnotary embeds into a normal TLS session.
yeah, it seems obvious in retrospect eh. on the other hand, there's probably several other visual aids we could add (in the spirit of the little man icons for auditor/auditee, and in the spirit of the cloudflare diagram)
only danger is it gets completely overwhelming at some point, i suppose.
oakpacific
perception: "overwhelming=high quality project"
i sometimes want to yell when i see politicians throwing words together to create phrases with contradictory meanings
wasn't it just yesterday when we discussed bank secrecy act which is supposed to be about AML/KYC on your customers
now it's about keeping the confidentialities of customers accounts wtf
waxwing
oakpacific, yes. there is another concept of 'bank secrecy' historically in europe though.
the 'societe anonyme' tradition in switzerland and luxembourg.
you've probably heard of it right. for example 'numbered bank accounts'.
meaning accounts only owned by a number, no personal identity attached.
switzerland has been pressured by the US in the last decade or so to more or less remove this. well, don't know the details, but it's been heavily attacked.
there is a well worn tradition of german businessmen stacking the back of their BMWs with deutschmarks/euros and going on a little 'vacation' to Luxembourg :)
oakpacific
in any case it will be no more in the looming cashless utopia
moo-_-
waxwing: it has come to the point U.S. people don't get bank accounts in Switzerland banks
and the existing account holders are kicked out
'there was a recent news
waxwing
moo-_-, right. it is very bad for US expats.
that's kind of a slightly different issue. but related.
oakpacific
congrats on the USG for finally finding a way to circumvent the constitutional protection of their people after 200 years of trying
if you want me to upvote or bump anything, im always happy to
oakpacific
not counting those who are already members of the guards ;)
belcher
i dont really know what else i can do to help
i found you guys through reading forums anyway : )
waxwing at least
oakpacific
belcher: yeah tks those are some really good works :) mailed justcoin yesterday anyway
so my mother was like "you are near and have no girlfriend, I know this girl in London maybe you want to get in contact", then I knew that she worked in an investment bank