#timvideos

mithro: I'm back - did you track down where that crazy filename came from?

mithro: getting closer: qemu-system-or1k -M litex ... SoC BIOS / CPU: MOR1K / 100MHz (good)

Serving cmdline.txt to 192.168.100.50:7642 ... File build/tftpd//cmdline.txt not found

guessing bad.

mithro: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/7xrGvrDRdw/

Title: Ubuntu Pastebin (at paste.ubuntu.com)

CarlFK: cmdline and initrd should be fine?

mithro: good morning

mithro: juser@gator:~/tv/litex-buildenv$ find ./ -name cmdline.txt -> nothing

shorne: https://github.com/stffrdhrn/gcc.git shares no common commits with git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git ?

Title: GitHub - stffrdhrn/gcc: GCC port rewrite for OpenRISC (at github.com)

CarlFK: you don't need any cmdline or initrd IIRC

mithro: I never see Welcome to Buildroo; buildroot login:

CarlFK: :-(

CarlFK: Do you see any kernel boot output?

mithro: nope - just this http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/7xrGvrDRdw/

Title: Ubuntu Pastebin (at paste.ubuntu.com)

CarlFK: poke shorne

shorne: fix it!!! :p

4am - I'm going to kick off the re-image and run through everything again when I wake up

shorne: Your patches don't seem to have tags in the history?

shorne: I rebased your branch on Github onto the 8.2.0 release here -> https://github.com/mithro/gcc

Title: GitHub - mithro/gcc: GCC port rewrite for OpenRISC (at github.com)

shorne: What is the best way to check if it's actually correct?

shorne: Looks like I should be using or1k-port-2a branch instead?

_florent_: https://github.com/enjoy-digital/litex/commit/6... :-P

Title: soc/cores: init clock abstraction module · enjoy-digital/litex@63fc395 · GitHub (at github.com)

_florent_: I had been thinking of doing exactly that....

mithro: that's quite useful in fact: https://github.com/enjoy-digital/litedram/commi... :)

Title: example/litedram_gen: simplify clocking with new S7PLL module, a lot … · enjoy-digital/litedram@30c32f5 · GitHub (at github.com)

mithro: hello

reading history

_florent_: Yeah

shorne git@github.com:stffrdhrn/gcc.git (push)

upstream git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git (fetch)

git merge-base shorne/or1k-port-2a upstream/master

12bc22a62153fd13fda518c52416a0081063eaf5

maybe you are not using or1k-port-2a? the tag is or1k-9.0.0

yeah, I'm on or1k-port the default branch

hmm, I should change the default branch, I changed it after submittingversion 1 for upstream review

CarlFK: sure I am meaning to work on it

trying to finish some binutils/gcc patches first

mithro: what do you mean patches have tags? git tags?

I have tags or1k-*

ede0f945e1d6744f89c1e9b9e46b23aa3e054362 ?

tansell@tansell-glaptop:~/github/timvideos/conda-hdmi2usb-packages/temp/gcc$ git describe --tags --match gcc*

fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything.

shorne: https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/P4ovIhxN/

I am not sure rebasing on 8.2.0 would work there may be a few APi changes

but I can't remember, it might work

What version of binutils are you using

ha() is something new, not upstream yet

so... it looks Like it did compile

mithro: check out https://github.com/stffrdhrn/binutils-gdb/tree/...

Title: GitHub - stffrdhrn/binutils-gdb at or1k-6 (at github.com)

there is a tag

Title: Release or1k-2.30.51: or1k: fix issue with l.maci not sign extending · stffrdhrn/binutils-gdb · GitHub (at github.com)

mithro: sorry, I am not sure what you mean by my commit is not tagged

shorne: yes, compiled fine -> https://github.com/mithro/gcc

Title: GitHub - mithro/gcc: GCC port rewrite for OpenRISC (at github.com)

Good morning o/

mithro: sorry, I think you need my latest version for binutils-gdb too

this confusion is why I want to get this all upstream asap

shorne: how does binutils-gdb and binutils releases relate?

binutils-gdb contains both binutils and gdb

from 1 repo they release 2 separate things

when releasing bintuils it includes objdump,gas,ld

when releasing gdb it includes gdb

but the 2 of them inter depend on cpu,bfd and other architecture definition infrastructure in binutils-gdb

mithro: https://github.com/enjoy-digital/litex/pull/109 Could you take a look when you have the chance please?

Title: Improve XIP Support by cr1901 · Pull Request #109 · enjoy-digital/litex · GitHub (at github.com)

shorne: What I want is a patch for gcc-8.2.0 which adds or1k support and a patch for binutils-2.31.1

shorne: Trying to use those versions for all architectures

ok, I am about to get on the plane in copenhagen, what you have on top of gcc-8.2.0 looks good

if you want to do the same for binutils-gdb using my or1k-6 branch it should work

mithro: if not I will try to help out when I get back to tokyo

shorne: the commits which start with or1k seem to be what I want?

yes... or just cherry-pick everything after c44deb735e

for the or1k-6 branch its very small set of squashed patches it should be easy to spot

mithro: but no I remember... the problem with binutils-gdb is between 2.31.1 and current head is there were a bunch of upstream or1k patches for new API's whitespace cleanup done by binutils maintainers

the patches might not apply cleanly

:(

*now I remember*..

shorne: There seem to be like just 4 patches at the end which apply cleanly?

we'll see how I go

cr1901_modern: Seems good to me - Do you want to poke _florent_ ?

cr1901_modern: hi, sorry, i saw that this morning then forget to merge. Thanks, that's also fine for me, going to merge.

cr1901_modern: done :)