#timvideos

/

      • mithro
      • tpb
        Title: Snippet | IRCCloud (at www.irccloud.com)
      • Kamilion has quit
      • Kamilion joined the channel
      • rohitksingh_work joined the channel
      • sb0 has quit
      • mithro
      • tpb
        Title: flterm/flterm.c at master · timvideos/flterm · GitHub (at github.com)
      • shenki
      • tpb
        Title: Fix parsing of line-ending option by shenki · Pull Request #4 · timvideos/flterm · GitHub (at github.com)
      • Kamilion has quit
      • mithro
        cr1901_modern: ping?
      • sb0 joined the channel
      • Kamilion joined the channel
      • tpb
        Title: litex/core.py at master · enjoy-digital/litex · GitHub (at github.com)
      • cr1901_modern
        mithro: Pong. Sorry, I saw your message almost immediately, but didn't want to respond till I had some good news. First the bad news:
      • I didn't get much done the past week. libmodem still miscompiles and crashes at the tip of my HDMI2USB-litex-firmware tree.
      • Good news: I know for a fact that I introduced a compile option somewhere by accident that's causing the crash- idk what. In the interim, I forced using a known-to-work version of libmodem on the Opsis, otherwise compiling using the tip of my HDMI2USB-litex-firmware tree
      • Opsis firmware upload works!! Dual/Quad SPI bitbang works
      • So all I have to do is fix the miscompilation error (and add working timer to qemu) and we're good to go!
      • sb0 has quit
      • rohitksingh_work has quit
      • valessio joined the channel
      • sb0 joined the channel
      • rohitksingh joined the channel
      • CarlFK joined the channel
      • rohitksingh has quit
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: ping?
      • tumbleweed
        mithro: pong
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: So regarding, your new line pull request
      • tumbleweed
        yeah?
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: I'm pretty sure the change to firmware/stdio_wrap.c is wrong?
      • tumbleweed: Either we should change firmware/stdio_wrap to do "\n" to "\r\n" replacement and remove "\r\n" from all the strings - or firmware/stdio_wrap shouldn't touch the strings and we should use "\r\n" everywhere?
      • tumbleweed
        oh, LF,CR?
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: Hrm?
      • tumbleweed: I'm talking about this pull request -> https://github.com/timvideos/HDMI2USB-litex-fir...
      • tpb
        Title: Use CRLF line-endings by stefanor · Pull Request #341 · timvideos/HDMI2USB-litex-firmware · GitHub (at github.com)
      • tumbleweed
        I'm asking what you think about that change is wrong
      • and I'm guessing it does LFCR
      • to answer your more general questino: yeah, there's no reason to use CRLF internally, if there's some kind of io driver for network or serial termianls that translates to CRLF
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: Either we should change firmware/stdio_wrap to do "\n" to "\r\n" replacement always (and remove "\r\n" from all the strings) -- **or** we should use "\r\n" everywhere and firmware/stdio_wrap shouldn't touch the strings.
      • tumbleweed
        yes, I agree about that
      • but that does need coordination with the submodules
      • because there are prints all over the place
      • Ravenheart has quit
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: I like the idea of firmware/stdio_wrap doing the translation because of the prints all over the place
      • tumbleweed
        yeah
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: So, do you want to change that pull request to do that?
      • tumbleweed
        that is pretty much what it's doing
      • just not very elegantly
      • it changes all the (non-wrapped) printfs
      • if it did a little more inspection and translated '\r?\n' -> '\n' in the wrapper, then I could drop the changes to mdio.c
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: Hrm? If you are doing the translation in stdio_wrap, we should remove all the other \r\n right?
      • tumbleweed
        no, because not everything uses the wrappers
      • the wrappers provide wprintf, but there are some printfs scattered around
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: Where wprintf isn't used there is normally a special reason?
      • tumbleweed
        dunno?
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: But the wprintf related should be fixed then?
      • tumbleweed
        not sure what you're asking
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: If the wrapping functions are doing '\r\n', then we should remove all '\r\n' from the strings which are being sent to the functions?
      • tumbleweed
        sure
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: Happy to merge it then
      • tumbleweed
        OK, I'll have a shot at it
      • string manipulation in C. So much fun
      • esp without dynamic memory allocation
      • the other way around (have everyone do CRLF everywhere, and translate to LF if needed) would be far simpler memory-wise :)
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: Use static buffers?
      • tumbleweed
        yeah, I have to
      • (or call the wrapped prints multiple times)
      • I guess I'll crib the buffer size from the telnet bit
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: Yeah - you can't call a function with va_list multiple times
      • tumbleweed
        that's true
      • mithro
        tumbleweed: It appears to work at first until it doesn't
      • tpb has quit
      • tpb joined the channel