#solum

gecong proposed openstack/solum-specs: Removes unnecessary utf-8 coding https://review.openstack.org/414786

Merged openstack/solum: Trivial: Remove vim header from source files https://review.openstack.org/376192

zhurong proposed openstack/solum: Use heat plugin replace enable_service https://review.openstack.org/414914

hey devkulkarni

good evening zhurong

good monring devkulkarni

how is it going?

I had changed my company recently, there can not login IRC in the working time

looks like you have got Internet access figured out :)

ah I see.

you mentioned earlier that your open source contributions will now increase

we need some BP statistics, So I added some bps, sorry for that. :(

for that don't you need irc login? how are you managing that

yeah, I saw some blueprints that you filed

yep, but seems not as expected, also had some extra things need to do

ah I see.

Next month I will using my phone network to login the IRC

oh okay. as long as you are able to join the irc meetings and we are able to sync up every day or every couple of days, it should be fine

And If you have time, pls do some flavor to approve the BPs, much appreciate for this.

zhurong: btw, did you read the email about nova-docker.. they are retiring that project. we will have to figure out strategy of what to use instead of nova-docker in our devstack setup

IRC meeting I will join

zhurong: sure, I can do that.. do you have links to the bps handy right now?

I can go through them right now

yep, agree with this, we need to replace nova-docker

cool, will go through them in a bit

OK, thanks

about, nova-docker replacement, what are our options?

one is integrating with magnum and write a docker deployer

another is to integrate with zun and use zun deployer

seems we discuss this some months ago, zun

third is we can use the CoreOS based flow where we spin up a CoreOS VM and then deploy container on it

are there other options?

yes, we had discussed about possibility of using zun

I don't know how far evolved it is

fourth option is to keep nova-docker flow as it is assuming that the code repository would still be available

we can check with the infra team whether they are going to keep the code repository

so we can not using the latest nova, neutron, devstack, etc

yep, that is correct

I was thinking that

so even if the code repo exists, it is better for us to investigate other deployment options

I thinks so

I was thinking we can make this feature as the main feature/deliverable for this cycle, what do you think?

agree with this

are there other options besides above three?

nothing from mine

I have approved the blueprints

lets discuss about replacement of nova-docker in this week's IRC meeting

thanks

sure, let's discuss in the meeting

we can come up with action items of what needs to be done also

cool

yep

devkulkarni there are two BPs need approve

I approved all three for which you shared the links.. are there two more?

wait

I just realized that the "Definition" needs to be also changed to Approved

I just did that

please check

thanks

zhurong: will be back in some time. if you are gone by then, we can catch up tomorrow again

OK

cool.