#solum

Angus Salkeld proposed a change to stackforge/solum: API: Fix the sensor_type and value https://review.openstack.org/58171

Angus Salkeld proposed a change to stackforge/solum: API: some doc string nits https://review.openstack.org/58676

Angus Salkeld proposed a change to stackforge/solum: Docs: layout our docs like the official openstack docs https://review.openstack.org/58424

Rajdeep proposed a change to stackforge/solum: Add Negative test for Root Controller of Solum API https://review.openstack.org/58683

asalkeld: hi

asalkeld: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58424/4

asalkeld: Does the final URL has anything to do with the directory layout?

asalkeld: Will this be accessible like this ?

<http://ln-s.net/:mUt>; (at docs.openstack.org)

looking

noorul, we are not incubating yet, so it's not going to be in openstack.org

when that happens

we will have to move the different secstions out

will this be /develop_applicationsns

I just wanted the sections to match

so it would be easy to see what we need to write and so it would be easy to move

so yes

I don't think the path is important

Hi -- waiting for final review of my CL https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58683/

who else can help

rajdeep_: You need to wait :)

ok, since i am new to solum

not sure about the process

:)

<http://ln-s.net/:mW+>; (at russellbryant.net)

<http://ln-s.net/:RB8>; (at wiki.openstack.org)

thanks

See policies and review guidelines section