#selenium

WhereIsMySpoon: they get me places and never had an issue

sorry the bot response was just amusing to me :p

AutomatedTester: okay

WhereIsMySpoon: except that one time where davehunt and I got dropped off at Frankfurt instead of LHR

AutomatedTester: well, frankfurt is almost london

but that wasn't United's fault

to americans anyway

:p

The RC firefox proxy tests aren't working

who tests that? :)

is it in ci?

what is a CI

Apparently "absolutely noone"

AutomatedTester: coke inhaler?

simonstewart: for more than a year. nobody cares

if it's not in CI, it's the same as the test not existing

WhereIsMySpoon: doesnt that cause drowning

I'm pretty sure I've fixed that more than once

coke is a liquid, inhaling a liquid can be bad

or maybe Care Inhibitor

AutomatedTester: weaksauce coke :P

simonstewart: did you answer my question about eng prod engineers yesterday?

I don't know. did I?

let's go with no :)

I might have missed it, why I was asking

so basic marionette support in .NET is easily doable

well not easily, but i have it working locally in a branch

AutomatedTester: does marionette support custom profile settings? if so, how are they propagated to the driver?

jimevans: not atm

we should add that

i'd guess people are going to want to customize their profiles for use with marionette, so yeah. but that's on y'all to figure out how to propagate that to the driver (via capabilities, i'm sure, but what the format is, that's another matter).

jimevans: the interesting case, that just came to me, is what happens if an addon isnt signed

do we not create the session or...

II need to speak to my team

if you want my opinion, i'm rather indifferent. we can't make up our collective mind about how to handle incorrect configuration on session startup (see debate on desired vs. required capabilities), so i don't know that i really have an opinion on what should happen.

as long as you make a decision and document it. :)

Good morning guys, would love some help from any JS experts or maintainer here if anyone has a moment to spare.

mekdev: :ask

If you have a question, please just ask it. Don't look for topic experts. Don't ask to ask. Don't PM. Don't ask if people are awake, or in the mood to help. Just ask the question straight out, and stick around. We'll get to it eventually :)

Do we support calling generators using the provided mocha control flow with the latest 2.47 release ?

I wanted to do this var apiResponse = yield someHttpRequest(); from inside test.it("Test Name", function* () {};

mekdev: have you tried it?

we are heavily using the provided test wrapper

yes i have

it dies at the start of the generator function

so I was not sure If I was doing smth wrong

or if it was supported

at this point i step aside as ive never used mocha

Thats ok WhereIsMySpoon: TY! for some context we have a WebClient which is the equivalent to a PageObject but for Rest API calls

inside we opt for co-requests which are all generator calls

i dont know if there's a mocha chat or forum but i think it would be better to ask there or maybe on stackoverflow

this is a channel specificaly for selenium questions

specifically*

got it! but the provided mocha wrapper is part of the selenium-webdriver package

erm

this dude - http://selenium.googlecode.com/git/docs/api/jav...

lukeis, go ^ :P

where am i going?

space!

i dunno i thought that selenium was provided as-is

also opened to help make this work and helping out but will need some guidance

not with test framework wrappers around then

:api

.NET: http://goo.gl/uutZjZ | Java: http://goo.gl/Grc6tm | Ruby: http://goo.gl/jzh4RU | Python: http://goo.gl/sG1GfQ | Javascript: http://goo.gl/hohAut

better url for the api docs

thanks lukeis!

Anyone know how to get eclipse to shade a jar as part of the build?

with maven? ;)

"thanks"

simonstewart: shade?

you mean to not include it/

?*

repackage a jar, renaming classes as necessary

uhh

<_> no idea, never heard of the term before

seems like a weird name for it

That's the maven term for it

you haven't been exposed to the evils that simon (or myself) have been then

clearly

ideally… one should not do this at all :)

yea..sounds like meddling you really shouldnt be doing

So, the jetty9 update is almost ready, except for this one thing

although one is not always in charge of the original packaging of a jar, and may require repackaging to strip out cruft

then you arent using the same library

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Hmmm... can't check in a symlink because "Windows"

imagine dependency convergences with the packaged jar ;)

lukeis: id rather not

Right. I have a plan

uh oh

quick, batten the hatches

what's the worst that can happen to something that's currently broken? ;)

it could become more broken?

maybe it'll burn down, fall over, then sink into the swamp.

lmao

no jimevans, that's just florida

"but the next one stayed!!"

huge...tracts of lands

land*

well cy'all in a couple weeks :)

holiday timee

enjoy!

cheers

[13selenium] 15jimevans pushed 1 new commit to 06master: 02http://git.io/vcWZD

13selenium/06master 14219e898 15Jim Evans: Updating screenshot code to retain scroll bars in required directions....

Where has holiday time end of September?

barancev: ready for a jetty9 bump?

if file upload a part of the w3c spec, I don't see any mention of it

*is

Brace yourselves

If this doesn't break the build, nothing will

[13selenium] 15shs96c pushed 1 new commit to 06master: 02http://git.io/vcWC0

13selenium/06master 140697307 15Simon Stewart: Bump the Jetty version from 7 to 9...

:whobrokeit

simonstewart

Aye

just preempting

You all have my permission to either frantically hack on it, or fix it

Venus_Mars: did you get your window handling thing figured out?