#pyladies

[o__o]: image me fabulous puppy

[redacted]

[redacted]

I NEED A DRINK

So, okay, on this ticket. Everything is going great. Then my migration doesn't work

That's weird. Normally south migrations just, you know, do their thing.

NOT WHEN THE TABLE HAS 1.6 MILLION ENTRIES

So, okay, we can use this other model instead that can be nulled.

NOPE, UX PERSON DIDN'T LIKE THE DROPDOWN.

Alright, fine, we'll just do a raw SQL query.

OMG WE MIGHT GET AN ERROR FOR A LITTLE BIT ON A NON-PUBLIC-FACING WEBPAGE

I am running out of reasonable options.

[redacted]

[redacted]

There are lots of opinions about this thing.

[redacted]

Oh, and my original solution? It wouldn't have had any issues.

Usually, devs are given more weight. This is one of those projects where there's SO MANY cooks.

time to poison a few soup pots

I have to admit, though, everyone has been very nice about the fact that I blew up production.

That’s why I’m glad I work in video gaming and not life-critical systems

[redacted]

[redacted]

:-D

[redacted]

she didn't say south screwed up

Heh

she said south shat itself with 1.6m records

completely understandable

And that's common with South

I disagree

[redacted]

Here's how I use South:

Get south to make a migration

2 million records sound normal size to me

Test migration

lahwran: nope, i'm not a millionaire

[redacted]

If it fails, delete migration and ask south to try again.

[redacted]

merwok: awesome for you ;)

Python people seem to love to hate non-relational databases, but then again, for defined use cases, it works fucking great

[redacted]

lahwran: you should chill on the trying to convince people django is horrible, btw

lahwran: sounds like an awesome talk

it's pretty annoying

But you know what?

My nails are magic today.

[redacted]

[redacted]

So everything is going to be okay.

kcunning: oh shit

[redacted]

[redacted]

[redacted]

kcunning: you're a witch

I AM

[redacted]

lahwran: ?

Please join #cagematch for all of your framework fights.

[redacted]

[redacted]

[redacted]

[redacted]

[redacted]

[redacted]

The whole chrome line is amazing.

lahwran: eh, i'm grumpy today

lahwran: no harm, no foul

I’m grumpy most days

But then again, I computer for a living

^

i started the day an hour early with a 2 hour meeting

so....

You win the losing game

[redacted]

OK

troll

:)

I can’t send you a deferred hug, I use a synchronous web framework :(

So I’m just going to block in front of my screen

And then time out

Don't die, though :P

Dying isn't nice

No I’ll just wait for the next requst

heh

s/unicorn/pegasus

[redacted]

[redacted]

Guido really seems to dislike inline callbacks

(last time I read that email thread anyway)

[redacted]

[redacted]

__love__: he's referencing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y, a classic (and hilarious) Monty Python sketch

oooh

TIL

oh hey, they make fun of git in that sketch

Okay, which of these talks seems the most like something you would want to hear?

PyCon 2014 coderanger?

yeah

* Application Deployment State of the Onion

* The Web App of a Thousand Faces (monomyth)

* How we run Python (PSF infra)

* What is coming in Python packaging

YEAH

#2 and #4

coderanger: I suggest you reply to Nick’s email about packaging panel proposal

merwok: I think that would be different target audience

PSF infra: is the goal just to inform or also invite the community to contribute?

merwok: Mostly inform