##osx-server

/

      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • samfrumsd has quit
      • bittin joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • Screak42 has quit
      • Screak42 joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • CrypticSquared joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • gbatye has quit
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell has quit
      • gbatye joined the channel
      • gbatye_ joined the channel
      • gbatye__ joined the channel
      • gbatye has quit
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • gbatye_ has quit
      • gbatye__ has quit
      • gbatye_ joined the channel
      • gbatye__ joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • gbatye_ has quit
      • gbatye__ has quit
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • ibiwan has quit
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • Branes joined the channel
      • Branes
        G'day.
      • BrianBlaze420 joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • nronksr has quit
      • gbatye joined the channel
      • gbatye_ joined the channel
      • gbatye has quit
      • cwesterfield-awa has quit
      • gbatye_ has quit
      • nronksr joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell joined the channel
      • mwcmitchell has quit
      • CPngN has quit
      • gbatye_ joined the channel
      • gbatye_ has quit
      • NEO_AMiGA joined the channel
      • BrianBlaze420 has quit
      • gbatye joined the channel
      • gbatye has quit
      • BrianBlaze420 joined the channel
      • gbatye joined the channel
      • samfrumsd joined the channel
      • gbatye has quit
      • gbatye joined the channel
      • gbatye has quit
      • gbatye joined the channel
      • NEO_AMiGA has quit
      • Foxyloxy joined the channel
      • NEO_AMiGA joined the channel
      • NEO_AMiGA has quit
      • CrypticSquared joined the channel
      • Foxyloxy joined the channel
      • trifygri joined the channel
      • Foxyloxy joined the channel
      • Foxyloxy_ joined the channel
      • gbatye has quit
      • NEO_AMiGA joined the channel
      • samfrumsd has quit
      • nakago has quit
      • nakago joined the channel
      • dknuth has quit
      • dknuth joined the channel
      • EnigmaFX has quit
      • EnigmaFX joined the channel
      • slowfranklin joined the channel
      • Kuchiru has quit
      • Kuchiru joined the channel
      • `Cam joined the channel
      • `Cam has quit
      • mr_rcollins
        Good morning!
      • AOllivierre joined the channel
      • mrgrey joined the channel
      • squirke joined the channel
      • GenericUsername joined the channel
      • TyrfingMjolnir joined the channel
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        Sedorox: I'm reading your post on BSDP: http://brandon.penglase.net/index.php?title=Get...
      • Will this still work with the newest versions of the OS?
      • I would really like to have 10.4, 10.6, 10.9, and 10.11
      • fuzzylogiq
        All our netboot servers are linux running BDSP and we boot up to 10.11
      • Branes has quit
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        Nice
      • Anything that has to be customized for each version?
      • Or can I just add more instances of what is on the page I linked to?
      • Gadfly joined the channel
      • electro33 has quit
      • tansharma joined the channel
      • Sedorox
        TyrfingMjolnir: haven't tried it, but don't see why it wouldn't
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        And do I need netboot images, or can I convert a regular installer image to netboot image?
      • Sedorox
        might have to adjust a few things
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        Such as?
      • Sedorox
        if they updated versions of the netboot spec
      • I doubt they did tho
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        OK
      • I'm asking because somebody wrote that I would need to have the same version netboot as the MacOS X hosting the file
      • Sedorox
        but to the best of my knowledge (it's been a bit since I worked on it), I haven't heard anyone saying it didn't work with the newer ones
      • hmm
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        But that might be if the MacOS X Server is used to host the images
      • Sedorox
        like the OS serving the netboot file needs to be the same version as the netboot? that sounds off
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        No
      • That images will have to be signed for the OS hosting it?
      • fuzzylogiq
        the netboot image must contain drivers for the hardware it is booting
      • slowfranklin has left the channel
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        I didn't quite understand
      • OK, I'll try this one
      • Sedorox
        yea... I'm not sure.. there is what fuzzylogiq just said.. which means you can't use a netboot OS version that is lower than your hardware is
      • fuzzylogiq
        so if you have a new piece of hardware, it might not be bootable by your current image, and may need to have the image created on that hardware
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        Ideally I would like to have ISC DHCPD host netboot.xyz, BSDPm, and Windows images
      • Sedorox
        i.e. if you have a machine that shipped with 10.10 on it, you can't use a 10.8 netboot
      • TyrfingMjolnir: I don't see any reason you couldn't
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        oki
      • fuzzylogiq
        you might want to look at BSDPy too
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        I have BSDPy running on a separate node
      • Sedorox
        yea, there are some more nicer solutions out there now
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        However my problem is how to I make it coexist with the linux boot images
      • fuzzylogiq
        we don't use it but we're considering it because it has an API and we may offer it as a service
      • Cannot help you there, our servers just serve mac images
      • MacLemon has quit
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        I mean What's wrong with Sedorox approach? compared to BSDPy?
      • Sedorox
        the stuff I listed is just lower level, iirc
      • fuzzylogiq
        nothing, really...fewer people using it though
      • but it's the method we're using
      • Sedorox
        BSDPy (I'm assuming) just wraps it into a nice way of doing it
      • tansharma has quit
      • depends on what your end goal is, and what makes it easier to get there
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        But the Sedorox approach is just some lines in the config, right? While BSDPy is a separate application/daemon?
      • Sedorox
        I think so
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        What is the meaning of next-server: IP?
      • Sedorox
        and it isn't specifically my approach.. I just went through apple's docs on netbooting, and listed how to do it with isc-dhcp... not the first or the last to do it :)
      • next-server == tftpserver
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        I just used the term in this conversation to make a distinction between BSDPy and the other approach
      • Sedorox
        :)
      • the other advantage to bsdpy, if implemented correctly, is that you ccan pick the netboot image from 'Startup Disk' in system preferences
      • isc-dhcp is lacking on functionality to make that work
      • which apparently it does do: "What they have in common is that none are compatible with the OS X Startup Disk preference pane because it uses a randomized reply port instead of the standard port (68)."
      • I think for your puroses, doing the full isc-dhcp implementation, that you can then control for all the OSs, makes more sense
      • that's something I've been wanting to work on.. but lack of time and programming skills haven't alowed me to get far on that goal
      • TyrfingMjolnir
        Hmmm
      • Perhaps there is also an ipxe approach to BSDP>
      • ?
      • Sedorox
        hehe