I guess purge_destination exists to solve this problem
But again, still think it might be good to help prevent admin error
Nick_ZWG is not enthused about the fact that he keeps personally discovering what happens with admin error
frogor
heheh
Nick_ZWG
Hey, at least this one didn't rm -rf /
dgknuth__ joined the channel
Fysi_ joined the channel
alarmmm_ joined the channel
gneagle: Thanks for help catching my issue there, always appreciate the help
and that was phrased redundantly
alarmmm has quit
Carsten__ has quit
mgolisch has quit
Fysi has quit
egomez has quit
Fysi_ is now known as Fysi
Nick_ZWG has quit
tackittj joined the channel
slysir joined the channel
CMGeorge joined the channel
halloweenhead has quit
halloweenhead joined the channel
gmarnin joined the channel
egomez joined the channel
andrewseago joined the channel
Carsten__ joined the channel
Nick_ZWG joined the channel
Chalcahuite joined the channel
slysir has quit
elliotjordan joined the channel
halloweenhead has quit
MacInLew joined the channel
wheazel has quit
halloweenhead joined the channel
jschwenn joined the channel
UbiquitousChris has quit
jschwenn has quit
jschwenn joined the channel
UbiquitousChris joined the channel
dwurster has quit
dwurster joined the channel
Avatharian has quit
alesales_ joined the channel
Avatharian joined the channel
Allister joined the channel
Allister
tvsutton: made adjustment
alesales joined the channel
CMGeorge has left the channel
CMGeorge joined the channel
alesales_ has quit
bruienne joined the channel
alesales has quit
tvsutton
Allister: Thx
alesales joined the channel
It's maybe unfortunate PL uses the same package identifiers for the 10.9 and 10.10 distributions
Allister
yeah, it's left to the admin to keep straight
gneagle
Why's that?
Do they also use the same version #s?
Allister
yes
gneagle
D'oh
I can't understand that sort of thinking
Allister
it's not officially supported for the commercial version yet
gneagle
I have two different versions of this software, one for 10.9 and one for 10.10. I'll give them the same version number!
Allister
I should file a bug though
gneagle
Absolutely
It is a bug
Allister
wonder if they cover that case in semver.org...
gneagle
pkg versions <> software versions
Allister
diamond?
gneagle
semver is not applicable to pkg versions
do more coding
<> is != is -ne
Allister
TIL #2
gneagle
pkg versions should do two things. 1) Be unique from release/build to release.build, and 2) always go UP
Other than that, "semver" not that important.
3) (Optional, but highly recommended) be related to the software version in an understandable way
Allister
Google Drive Icon Helper is not how PrivilegedHelperTools should be named
foigus
GDriveConHelpur
gneagle
But it's not helpful to say "hey puppet isn't working right." "what version is installed" "x" "is that x for 10.9 or 10.10?" "Well I'm running 10.10... oh wait I was running 10.9 last week so this might be the 10.9 version of x"
gah
Allister
well the whole 'uninstall before OS upgrade' is whackadoodle, too
gneagle
what?!!!
They recommend you _uninstall_ Puppet before upgrading to OS?
kindof annoying the other agent OSes get distinct pkg names, whereas we get x86_64 as if there's a different proc class for years, or an i386 install available
CaOsKid joined the channel
mgolisch joined the channel
gmarnin
annoying that they don't officially support os x
gneagle
I think they do now
gmarnin
for the free version?
gneagle
I assumed you meant Puppet Enterprise because you said "support"