##osx-server

/

      • [d__d]
        laurendc said: "adamcodega: come into the fold"
      • Nick_ZWG
        That help needs to be fixed
      • adamcodega
        wut
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: i’m going to try a blank UDID with valid SN. and then see what the JSS does when I add the device
      • Allister
        zoooky I believe I spelunked in postgresql for that and didn't see it
      • might be in the newer version of Apple Configurator, tho
      • zoooky
        i’m hoping it’s smart enough to tell. i’m guessing not, because they’re probable using UDID and not SN to identify devices per apples’ developers guidelines
      • Nick_ZWG
        iPCU can do it.
      • elliotjordan joined the channel
      • Allister
        yeah, i hate ipcu tho
      • zoooky
        Nick_ZWG: yes, but didn’t apple quitly put iPCU to bed
      • Nick_ZWG
        Yes, they did.
      • zoooky
        I miss iPCU logs
      • bruienne
        quietly, with a bullet
      • ssshhh no more pain
      • zoooky
        bruienne: old yeller style
      • bruienne
        zoooky: spoiler alert, jeez
      • zoooky
        I don’t think apple will give me UDIDs of the devices I own…
      • bruienne: that’s lke complaining about romio and juliet .
      • Allister
        zoooky great advice from jeremyagost, http://lemonjar.com/iosconsole/
      • adamcodega
      • bochoven has quit
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: how long have you been sitting on that image? :#
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: it came up once before
      • Allister has quit
      • Nick_ZWG
        Lenovo made the only smart choice: http://news.lenovo.com/article_display.cfm?arti...
      • Kinda sad we couldn't have gotten to this point 10 years ago
      • zoooky
        Nick_ZWG: it was intresting to watch that evolve on reddit.
      • gneagle
        "our standard image will only include the operating system and related software, software required to make hardware work well (for example, when we include unique hardware in our devices, like a 3D camera), security software and Lenovo applications. "
      • weasel
      • zoooky
        mr weasel?
      • Nick_ZWG
        Sure, the Lenovo crap will still be on there
      • gneagle
        "Lenovo applications" == anything
      • Nick_ZWG
        but hey, it's a start
      • foigus
        "Our goal is clear: To become the leader in providing cleaner, safer PCs. "
      • Cleaner
      • Not clean
      • halloweenhead has quit
      • rtrouton
        This should hopefully keep the weaseling to a minimum - Lenovo will post information about ALL software we preload on our PCs that clearly explains what each application does.
      • gneagle
        "security software" <--- most of that is crappy adware as well
      • foigus
        Superfish--provides guided suggestions
      • bruienne
        also what are these "customarily expected" apps?
      • rtrouton
        But yeah, weasel language that they can point to in future lawsuits.
      • Jonukas joined the channel
      • bruienne
        much like a pain killer "Helps fight pain!"
      • zoooky
        icnsole looks cool
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: experimenting with it too, haven't sold the issue I was trying to fix yet though.
      • gbatye joined the channel
      • jvanosten has quit
      • jkimyoung joined the channel
      • zoooky
        what was that?
      • jessep2
        rtrouton: have you seen issues with loginwindow crashing (getting booted to the Login Window) when opening System Profiler on OS X VMs on ESXi?
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: devices on guest network can't reach caching server, that's fine I don't care, but they aren't failing back to Apple when they timeout.
      • rtrouton
        jessep2: I haven't seen that. 10.10 VM? Or 10.9.x?
      • jessep2
        10.9 VM
      • thumpba_ joined the channel
      • it’s minor issue and it’s intermittent
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: so they’re discovering the cache server, but can’t reach it?
      • rtrouton
        jessep2: One moment, let me see if I can reproduce on my end.
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: they are being told by Apple goto the caching server.
      • zoooky
        and the ipads work fine from other network segments?
      • trifygri joined the channel
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: yes.
      • rtrouton
        jessep2: Nope, not seeing it.
      • jessep2
        not that it matters but I usually access it by Apple menu->Option->Sys Pref, also this is over ARD/SS
      • zoooky
        muliple ip segements right?
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: yeah 192 versus 10.
      • Same router, same outgoing ISP
      • jessep2
        with VMware Tools installed, FWIW
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: sounds like a network issue
      • rtrouton
        jessep2: That's roughly what I did. Apple menu: About this Mac: More Info: System Report.
      • squirke joined the channel
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: yeah need to verify who they are trying to hit.
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: like those segements are walled off, and they need to allow traffic to the cache server
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: I don't want them to talk to the caching server.
      • jessep2
        rtrouton: okay, well thanks for giving a try :)
      • rmanly has quit
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: tried setting resistrct ip ranges on the server?
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: not through advanced settings, just through "local subnets only"
      • abbaZaba_ joined the channel
      • jessep2
        justinrummel: did the re work out okay?
      • Avatharian joined the channel
      • aaronc_ joined the channel
      • justinrummel
        jessep2 no, it returns an error b/c the recipe does not like using parenthesis, and when I get a trimmed down regex with brackets it states no match found
      • It may be just Vivaldi's website... going to try a different one.
      • abbaZaba has quit
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202657 ListenRangesOnly
      • halloweenhead joined the channel
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: yeah I have that bookmarked.
      • jkimyoung has quit
      • thered_ joined the channel
      • cshepp11 joined the channel
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: funny cause I want to move some network segements to another public IP. and I know when I do so. i’m going to have to figure out the reverse. lol
      • thered has quit
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: why dont they just time out and download from Apple?
      • jessep2
        justinrummel: i see what happened - the RE of Shea’s works okay - the download changed to an HTTPS
      • so just add an ’s’ to the re pattern
      • arrose joined the channel
      • downloads the dmg for me fine :)
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: *shrug* no clue, I have to say from my perspective. timing out is probable better then going to apple. So my internet connection doesn’t get saturated with apple updates. rather have them keep trying for the local till they get it and update.
      • adamcodega: sounds like a good feature request to put in with apple. allow admins to set fail open or fail closed.
      • justinrummel
        jessep2 hmm.... wonder now what I'm doing wrong as I get "No valid recipe found for Vivladi.download"
      • adamcodega
        Yeah.
      • jessep2
        justinrummel: was that a joke? :) VivALdi.download
      • zoooky
        adamcodega: take it you can’t change their public IP address for those guest segements?
      • so tried creating a JSS asset by API with SN but without UDID. then added the asset to the JSS. It created a new asseet. instead of pairing the two records together.
      • adamcodega
        zoooky: no, we have a primary and backup WAN
      • zoooky
        so it deffently seems like the JSS is using UDID for device ID.
      • justinrummel
        nope, went to the basic fundamentals and start at the first parent recipe
      • and I guess that is my problem. pkg works
      • Ugh.. doing stupid things hurt
      • jvanosten joined the channel
      • aaronc_ has quit
      • jvanosten has quit
      • squirke has quit
      • squirke joined the channel
      • DLSteve joined the channel
      • Nick_ZWG
        Okay, I have solved the Chef bootstrap problem by doing it The Wrong Way™ but it works
      • arrose
        Nick_ZWG are you going the FB route of bootsrapping Munki with Chef?
      • rtrouton
        Nick_ZWG: You aren't using the private key on the clients, are you?
      • Nick_ZWG
        No, and no.
      • So I guess that (private key on clients) would be The Worst Way™ and no I'm not doing that
      • Instead, I have a launchdaemon continually running the one specific Chef recipe until the CSR is signed
      • like i said
      • The Wrong Way
      • or at least a not very efficient way
      • until I figure out some kind of notification mechanism
      • jessep2
        justinrummel: cool, be sure to submit an issue to Shea’s repo
      • or submit a PR
      • justinrummel
        jessep2 already did!
      • jessep2
        :)
      • justinrummel
      • arrose
        Nick_ZWG shouldn't signing client certs be manual anyway?
      • Nick_ZWG
        Of course not.
      • It should be policy-based!
      • (That's Project #2)
      • arrose has quit
      • rtrouton
        I think Puppet handles the client cert signing automatically. Casper does as well.
      • Nick_ZWG
        Puppet does this really well.
      • Chef doesn't use client certs, which is why I'm doing it
      • rtrouton
        Nick_ZWG: So Chef isn't encrypting communication between clients and the Chef backend?
      • Nick_ZWG
        It is, but not with certs.
      • Jonukas
        Apple's License Agreement for OS X says that you can only run "up to two (2) additional copies or instances of the Apple Software within virtual operating system environments on each Mac Computer you own or control that is already running the Apple Software". How does this apply to instances run under VMware ESXi? OS X isn't "already running" on ESXi machines and only running two instances seems unreasonable.
      • Nick_ZWG
        Rather, it is, but not using CA client certs.
      • gingimli joined the channel
      • Jonukas
        I should add that I'm really talking about OS X Server.
      • Nick_ZWG
        Jonukas: It means, technically speaking, you can't run more than 3 OS X VMs per machine.
      • That being said, there's no *technical* limitation.
      • Jonukas
        So it's more of a legal limitation than a technical one.