-
agabert
its port2 for you
-
you want to bind the 192.168.254.254 port to veth1
-
it works like this:
-
the fakeuplink bridge has veth0 enslaved
-
imagine a crossover shielded twisted pair cable going between veth0 and veth1
-
aliemieshko
host host0 add binding port router router1 port port2 interface veth1 ?
-
agabert
like a real oldschool cable
-
port2 is what you want to click into veth
-
veth1
-
so traffic from port2 goes into veth1
-
goes into crossover cable
-
comes out fakeuplink slave port veth0
-
goes to fakeuplink bridge
-
linux kernel does the rest
-
its ugly but it works
-
if you dont have a spare nic
-
aliemieshko
midonet> host host0 add binding port router router1 port port2 interface veth1
-
Internal error: {"message":"Validation error(s) found","code":400,"violations":[{"message":"Interface is already bound to a port.","property":""}]}
-
agabert
run host host0 binding list
-
aliemieshko
midonet> host host0 binding list
-
host host0 interface veth1 port router0:port1
-
host host0 interface tap2e9313fd-d5 port bridge0:port1
-
agabert
what is router0
-
is it internal router or provider router?
-
aliemieshko
internal
-
agabert
that is wrong
-
aliemieshko
midonet> router list
-
router router0 name router state up infilter chain0 outfilter chain1
-
router router1 name MidoNet Provider Router state up
-
agabert
we are talking about binding the port of the provider router to veth1
-
aliemieshko
how can i change it ?
-
abikfalvi joined the channel
-
agabert
if you want to bind the internal router you must not use the same network on both sides of the world
-
you are in the overlay world
-
and you are in the physical world
-
and on both sides you use 192.168.254/24
-
this will never work
-
you have to remove the binding
-
and bind the provider router port to veth1
-
aliemieshko
how can i do is ?
-
agabert
host host0 delete binding and then press <TAB> a lot
-
it has a sort-of autocomplete help
-
aliemieshko
midonet> host host0 delete binding
-
host interface port
-
agabert
i think its host host0 delete binding port
-
but i dont know for sure, i never did it in the cli
-
just try different commands, it cannot break
-
aliemieshko
midonet> host host0 delete binding port
-
Syntax error at: ...binding port
-
agabert
look
-
the midonet cli syntax is special
-
you have to understand the concept of scoping and aliases
-
have you worked with a router cli before?
-
jfjoly joined the channel
-
it pretends to be a 'chic' router cli
-
abikfalvi has quit
-
aliemieshko
no
-
agabert
me neither
-
so this is hard for you and me
-
apuimedo
:P
-
agabert
but we will make it
-
apuimedo
it's liek the cisco ones, isn't it?
-
*like
-
aliemieshko
ok, maybe i can delete all and then create again ?
-
agabert
yes and ryu owes me a lot of beer for that. probably more than i can ever drink.
-
aliemieshko: delete what?
-
apuimedo
xD
-
abikfalvi joined the channel
-
aliemieshko
my router
-
agabert
midonet> host host0 binding list
-
host host0 interface eth1 port router0:port0
-
midonet> host host0 delete binding port router0:port0
-
midonet> host host0 binding list
-
midonet>
-
aliemieshko: dont be foolish, you are almost there
-
do host host0 binding list
-
then do the delete as you can see here
-
aliemieshko
midonet> host host0 binding list
-
host host0 interface veth1 port router0:port1
-
host host0 interface tap2e9313fd-d5 port bridge0:port1
-
agabert
i broke a demo system from me for you.
-
i hope you are happy now.
-
the binding must go to the provider router port
-
not the internal router
-
you did everything right
-
the only thing you need to do now is use the correct router
-
which is the provider router, not the other one
-
aliemieshko
sorry, I appreciate your help
-
midonet> router list
-
router router0 name router state up infilter chain0 outfilter chain1
-
router router1 name MidoNet Provider Router state up
-
router1
-
agabert
right
-
you wanna bind on router1
-
aliemieshko
ok, how ?
-
agabert
host list
-
router list
-
aliemieshko
first we need to delete old
-
agabert
we have
-
you deleted it: host host0 delete binding port router0:port0
-
where router0:port0 is the router and port you want to uncling
-
aliemieshko
yes
-
midonet> host host0 binding list
-
host host0 interface tap2e9313fd-d5 port bridge0:port0
-
agabert
good
-
now we can bind again
-
host list
-
router list
-
aliemieshko
midonet> host list
-
host host0 name node-6.domain.tld alive true
-
host host1 name node-8.domain.tld alive true
-
host host2 name node-7.domain.tld alive true
-
midonet> router list
-
router router0 name router state up infilter chain0 outfilter chain1
-
router router1 name MidoNet Provider Router state up
-
agabert
host host0 add binding port router router1 port port2 interface veth1
-
aliemieshko
midonet> host host0 add binding port router router1 port port2 interface veth1
-
Internal error: Invalid value field port: 1e1b4be8-f213-4e30-bb73-6cda4a2f8c15
-
agabert
router router1 port list
-
aliemieshko
midonet> router router1 port list
-
port port0 device router1 state up mac ac:ca:ba:4c:60:ad address 169.254.255.1 net 169.254.255.0/30 peer router0:port0
-
port port1 device router1 state up mac ac:ca:ba:69:e1:0f address 200.200.200.1 net 200.200.200.0/24 peer bridge1:port0
-
port port2 device router1 state up mac ac:ca:ba:d8:be:f8 address 192.168.254.254 net 192.168.254.0
-
agabert
now again
-
host host0 add binding port router router1 port port2 interface veth1
-
aliemieshko
midonet> host host0 add binding port router router1 port port2 interface veth1
-
host host0 interface veth1 port router1:port2
-
agabert
nice
-
now confirm
-
host host0 binding list
-
router router1 port list
-
aliemieshko
midonet> host host0 binding list
-
host host0 interface veth1 port router1:port2
-
host host0 interface tap2e9313fd-d5 port bridge0:port0
-
midonet> router router1 port list
-
port port0 device router1 state up mac ac:ca:ba:4c:60:ad address 169.254.255.1 net 169.254.255.0/30 peer router0:port0
-
port port1 device router1 state up mac ac:ca:ba:69:e1:0f address 200.200.200.1 net 200.200.200.0/24 peer bridge1:port0
-
port port2 device router1 state up mac ac:ca:ba:d8:be:f8 address 192.168.254.254 net 192.168.254.0
-
agabert
ryu_mido: you owe me a CCIE paper and a CCNA paper and a lot of beer (as already pointed out by yours truly)
-
goo
-
good
-
now do me a favor, go do commandline on node-6 and ping 192.168.254.254
-
the leg should come up and send icmp back
-
aliemieshko
[root@node-6 ~]# ping 192.168.254.254
-
PING 192.168.254.254 (192.168.254.254) 56(84) bytes of data.
-
From 192.168.254.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
-
agabert
ifconfig veth0 up
-
ifconfig veth1 up
-
ifconfig fakeuplink up
-
brctl show