TOPIC: MagnetoDB - NoSQL database service for OpenStack (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MagnetoDB, logs @ https://botbot.me/freenode/magnetodb/) | More info in our screencast http://goo.gl/21HRCf
No, i don`t. I believe that i`m finished with devstack integration
miarmak
ok, so you can change implementation status to Implemented. (Approved - it's definition, you should change field Implementation)
vnaboychenko
ok, done with this bp
miarmak
awesome)
vnaboychenko
what about next bp? Who should set the priority ?
actually is it a requirement ?
miarmak
for now, isviridov sets priority of all bp and bugs
so, for all such questions ping him
vnaboychenko
oh, then i wait for him
thank you for help
miarmak
you're welcome ;)
achudnovets
guys, when I reviewed this (ttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/82540) I found that we are storing keys as a tuple. I think this is bad practice. I think we should make keys count fixed or use a dict for the keys.
Aleksey Chuprin proposed a change to stackforge/magnetodb: Added MagnetoDB artifacts for publishing in Infra https://review.openstack.org/83403
miarmak
achudnovets: Yeah, I think dict is a nice idea
openstackgerrit
Vlad Naboichenko proposed a change to stackforge/magnetodb: Add way to launch stable, not_ready and in_progress tests in run_test.sh. https://review.openstack.org/83529
Vlad Naboichenko proposed a change to stackforge/magnetodb: Add way to launch stable, not_ready and in_progress tests in run_test.sh. https://review.openstack.org/83529
Andrei Ostapenko proposed a change to stackforge/magnetodb: Adds tempest tests on ReST API create_table and describe_table https://review.openstack.org/82005