cully: You may also want to look at http://logstash.net/docs/1.3.3/outputs/elastics... I think you can setup a TTL in the template for documents. But that may be a bit harder to figure out from my experience.
for the volume that I'm looking at TTL is too resource intensive; but I'm definitely looking at that index-mgmt stuff - thanks!
_maes_ joined the channel
eper has quit
sprachgenerator joined the channel
fllr joined the channel
fllr has quit
pblittle has quit
Outlander has quit
spuder_ joined the channel
gmcwhistler joined the channel
jhulten_ has quit
spuder has quit
spuder_ is now known as spuder
cwebber has quit
pblittle joined the channel
Outlander joined the channel
eper joined the channel
duck_tape has quit
ronnocol
untergeek: so, did some playing around w/ using ES as a KV store... 3 nodes (5 shards; 1 replica) using mget, I can lookup 1000 unique keys in < 200ms.
untergeek
cool
pmauduit has quit
ronnocol
so now they want to replace DynamoDB w/ ES :)
pheaver has quit
eper has quit
untergeek
woo!
well done
fllr joined the channel
are the ES nodes local or in AWS?
ronnocol
AWS
pmauduit joined the channel
I allocated 8g heap on an m1.xlarge
fedesilv_ joined the channel
fedesilva has quit
untergeek
and it's cheaper and more performant the way you've described?
than DynamoDB?
goqu has quit
andreibogatsky joined the channel
taion809 joined the channel
andreibogatsky has left the channel
atgiant joined the channel
atgiant
hello people
ronnocol
certainly more performant, and we absolutely believe it will be cheaper
atgiant: we don't have people here... just bots
atgiant
hello bots :)
resistance is futile
ronnocol
untergeek: but the biggest win is that it will be more versitile; We can use the same infrastructure to replace both DynamoDB *and* CloudSearch (further increasing the cost savings)
stoned75 joined the channel
van_jwc joined the channel
van_jwc
hey folks, quick question I'm hoping. Can I configure one lumberjack instance to send logs to different networks from one config file or can it run multiple config file? Or would I need to run additional instances for each config?
fllr has quit
as an example, I'd like to run both of these configs from one instance: {
I'm trying to do this for two reasons. 1) I may want to send different kinds of logs to differnt logstash servers and 2) when sending to one logstash server it seems far easier to configure the logstash side of things if it gets different kinds of logs to different ports.