cnf: no idea, I guess it depends on the query, time range, and lots of factos
factors
Licenser has quit
cnf
well, it's just one console running, that should not be a lot
Licenser joined the channel
Licenser has quit
Licenser joined the channel
Licenser has quit
torkelo
cnf: strange, might be some bug or specific case with your influxdb query
Licenser joined the channel
Licenser has quit
cnf
it's just grafana
Licenser joined the channel
torkelo
cnf: I am no expert on influxdb performance issues, so I am not the right person to ask
cnf
who would be?
torkelo
influxdb devs, influxdb mailing list, here
Licenser has quit
khoxsey has quit
you would need to provide info on your scenario, like number of series names, number of columns per series, ingestion rate (write rate), the specifc query, machine specs etc
cnf
it is all incredibly light, it's only local testing, nothing production scale, at all
torkelo
well then it should be easy to explain the scenario and replicate it
Licenser joined the channel
Licenser has quit
cnf
I guess I'll wait for the devs to wake up
Licenser joined the channel
Licenser has quit
Licenser joined the channel
Licenser has quit
torkelo
hm.. I do see cpu spikes every 5s when I I set on autorefresh also, with very simple queries, and very few series , datapoints
Licenser joined the channel
Licenser has quit
running influxdb 0.8
Licenser joined the channel
cnf
uhu
Licenser has quit
Licenser joined the channel
nphase joined the channel
em-dash has quit
nphase has quit
wojtczak joined the channel
wojtczak
hi, I tried to upgrade from 0.7.2 to 8.0 but now influxdb doesnt start. default config is used from deb package. there's nothing in logs except that it starts but no process is running in the end
i'm copying all data to try fresh but this rly sucks