#django

morenoh149: part of his point was that you should not need to change your implementation because client software doesn't handle cookies correctly

morenoh149: but in your case, changing the server implementation is more or less just flipping a few django settings

fwiw, i find token auth more convenient when i want to test with tools like httpie or such

alright in that case this is a good guide https://books.agiliq.com/projects/django-api-po...

not sure what the SessionAuthentication is doing there

i'd go with the DRF docs primarily

that agiliq site tells you to write a custom LoginView, but DRF ships that functionality already (`obtain_auth_token` view)

thanks for reading it

I think I still want sessionAuthentication in order for the browseable docs to work

the agiliq book doesn't mention password resets, guess I could use the package you linked for that

this is intresting, the browseable api requires the less secure cookie https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework... solution is to not allow it in production

So I've got this SQL query running against postgres but the django interface requires a queryset instance. Would Model.objects.raw(SQL) return a queryset?

Anyone know such app?

Or a good app to create on based on that?

eccentric_j: http://devdocs.io/django~2.1/ref/models/queryse... returns RawQuerySet which behaves like queryset

Ah, perfect! Thanks.

mostly like a queryset :)

Ah right, it's for the django admin so "mostly like a queryset" is all I think is needed.

CtrlC: I don't think it would be hard to modify django-messaging from the Pinax project to send anonymously

v0lksman, I want one side of the conversaion to not be able to see who's on the other side.

CtrlC: yeah would take a little bit of work but pretty sure you could do it with this: https://github.com/pinax/pinax-messages

Looking it up. Thanks.

though really just sounds like you need a table with a user and message field. User being the one that it's for. If you wanted to track the sender secretly you could as well. Not sure if you need all the mechanics of a messaging app

Nope, looks like I was wrong. Returning a RawQueryset from within a admin.SimpleListFilter's queryset method is returning an error

moldy: have you used drf swagger? I wonder if it can fetch a token and then perform authenticated requests

morenoh149: I would suggest looking into drf-yasg

how would one do 'KEY username (username),' properly in django? I'm doing that radius app I mentioned earlier

hanetzer: is that sql?

morenoh149: yeah. I'm translating schema.sql to models, doing pretty well so far

well key is what like a foreign key or primary key right

morenoh149: unsure. would you like to see schema.sql ?

sure

but you want to make django models from an existing schema?

morenoh149: https://bpaste.net/show/0eff8255d90c yeah.

did you already try https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.1/ref/djang...

morenoh149: yeah, I've looked into that, but I'd rather learn how to do this and that without using a tool to hopefully do it right

ok, so you need to grok sql and how django models will map to sql. Then reverse it for your problem.

yeah. but 'key' isn't such a unique term to google.

UNIQUE was easy, unique=True, default NULL default=None, etc

I'm trying pinax-messages. I also installed pinax-templates. but when I try to load localhost:8000/pinax/create/ , I get the following error:

'bootstrap' is not a registered tag library. Must be one of:

...

morenoh149: ah, its a symonym to INDEX

v0lksman, any idea?

hanetzer so db_index=True

yep. seems like it.

CtrlC: https://github.com/pinax/pinax-messages#customi...

hanetzer: gtk I don't know sql too well, try #sql or #postgres

morenoh149: gtk?

best I could find was maybe it's a natural key

good to know

ah

I thought index was create index on blah

How would I model this query in a django QuerySet? https://gist.github.com/jayzawrotny/d1af701fe53...

eccentric_j: can you paste your models.py as well?

jessamynsmith: Sure, but they're kind of big so I'll condense them to the essentials.

morenoh149: apparently its an idiom

Kipe_: is it better than https://marcgibbons.com/django-rest-swagger/

jessamynsmith: Ok updated gist https://gist.github.com/jayzawrotny/d1af701fe53...

eccentric_j: ok let me see what I can work out

jessamynsmith: Thanks a ton!

my primary key is called ID. When submitting a model formset Im getting {'id': ['This field is required.']}].... In my template I have <td> {{ form.instance.pk }}</td>

If it helps a more natural explanation would be "I want to filter OnboardingVenues who were created by users that belong to a company that have one or more merchants."

eccentric_j: thanks!

I'm just making a sample app now so I can test

hanetzer: got nothing in Learning SQL

anywho, dl'ing a daloradius appliance to have something to compare to/build from

eccentric_j: how do users get attached to companies?

jessamynsmith: money can be exchanged for goods and services

hanetzer: lol

jessamynsmith: It's the default behavior of django groups I think but there's an account_user_groups table with group id and user_id

eccentric_j: hm, maybe that got lost in translation...

let me see...

Ah sorry, they're referenced in the SQL and I tried to mention it in the models sample.

it might be that I don't have the full setup to see what you see

I should be able to fake something

Oh hmm I'll look at the source of the django auth Group\User models to see if they define the model to relate them

eccentric_j: so normaly you can add users to groups from the admin, but I hadn't done a custom admin for User so it wasn't there

Oh I see

Something is creating the association behind the scenes because `user.company` does return the company instance or None

yeah, I think I'll be able to add them once I get this custom admini working

Makes sense