#django

the id is the error

its expecting id

Well id is the error but do you know why?

seems because is not included on the rendering

That is wrong answer.

Don't guess. Check things out.

Specially since it's really easy to check out with debugger.

debugger in google?

google?

this guy is havving similar problem https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49026157/dj...

and someone advice it to put it as hidden

And don't read SO.

Which is most probably the wrong answer.

I am using restframework. Wanted to create a view for both create and update. I get this error. https://dpaste.de/mY10. Can someone please let me know what is wrong here. Error says expected url kwarg name. I did give the kwarg name.

usr123: ?name=... is a GET parameter, not a URL kwarg

you need something like path('<name:str>/', ...) in your urlconf

knbk: Thanks

o/

o/

Does anyone use meld for git diff?

Hello. Is there any sensible way to get request in pre_save signal? Trying to use it to save author of person doing edit in log. It used to work but seems when we upgraded from 1.10 to 2.0.5 something changed in django that screwed old method(now sometimes I didn't get any info, sometimes author was incorrect)

tneva82: So what was your "old methods"?

usr123: sure

tolja: So, when you compare, what are the two sections? master and current branch?

Depends on what you are comparing

tolja: Yeah, so how do I give it params? git difftool master currentbranch. That is fine?

Can't remember, check man git diff

tolja: Thanks

Greetings people! I have a bit of a model issue that I was hoping someone might offer me their two cents on. I've tried to draw it up in a UML-type diagram (https://pasteboard.co/HEIV9WR.png) and the issue is this: The subclasses of my abstract "Source" class would all be duplicated in the "SourceType" class. Yet there are attributes associated with the Source Type entity that can't be moved to either the abstract class or

the subclasses without breaking BCNF. Any ideas how to solve this in a more elegant way?

jtiai: I'm not sure how it anymore works but middleware that puts requests into global variable by thread and pulled when asked it from there. From the look of code think I found that from stackexchange or somewhere else

tneva82: localthread ?

or was it threadlocals...

_requests[current_thread()] = request <- save in middleware like this, use from threading import current_thread to get thread and return from the _requests with that

that doesn't seem right...

Stigster: You could put the fields common to Source and SourceType in another abstract model.

jtiai: Quite likely and now obviously it isn't as it worked.

tneva82: https://docs.python.org/3/library/threading.htm... you should do something like that to store request in thread locals. (and to read it in signal)

I figured roundaway way to do it by putting in author into instance before saving and grabbing it there in pre_save but that's major PITA

mattmcc: Hm! And then inherit from both in each subclass?

The subclasses would get it by default if they extend Source.

Er, sorry, misread. Yes.

SourceType(CommonStuff), Source(CommonStuff)

Although per rule of threes, it may be simpler to just duplicate the fields.

I still need to create the SourceTypes somewhere, though. As with the baseReliability / (instance)-reliability association (which is an example, the model isn't complete).

Source of type X has B reliability by default, this instance I of source type X has reliability R.

Correction: Sources of type X ... (plural)

mysql binary field shows values of 0 and 1 but when rendered in django all checkboxes are checked

yutro

I HAVE an issue with an ArrayField

any help will be greatly appreciated

cleaned_data is a dict, so form.cleaned_data['skills_search']

ah ok thanks mattmcc ..ill try that

hi

i try to migrate from django 1.9 to django 1.10 and i have test failed now

i try to set a session for an anomyous user

if i login before that works

any idea to fix that ?

mysql binary field shows values of 0 and 1 but when rendered in django all checkboxes are checked

in my model I have clientrevert = models.BooleanField(db_column='ClientRevert', default=False)

in my forms clientrevert = forms.BooleanField(initial=False,required=False)

on template <td>{{ form.clientrevert }}</td>

Hobbestigrou: Um... If you do have sessions middleware installed you should get session automatically for all users, even for anonymous users so you don't need to set it any special way.

jtiai, i confirm i have the middleware set in the settings

and if i login before i have my data in the session

Oh that of course doesn't apply to certain type of tests.

Since tests won't go trhough middleware.

ah ok

i don't understand the problem

Well provide full code and the traceback in pastebin. Maybe it's something else.

i have no traceback

just the failed, the assert

In django is possible to filter out all records that have a field not starting with 2 chars?

2 particular chars?

the opposite of `nonstartwith`

cryptopian: no any of [a-zA-Z]

I'm having trouble understanding how to structure my project. I'm creating a website which on the homepage will have products, campaigns, offers and banners which can be added through the admin page. How would you structure this? Would you create apps for those different categories or make a single homepage app?

.exclude(field__startswith?)

The opposite of .filter() is .exclude()

kezabelle, cryptopian but how I specifiy `all chars`?

Hobbestigrou: Hmm, pytest. I've no idea does it affect your tests somehow.

@realnot: Link above. You can use a regex in a query to get what you need

jtiai, i have also try with the django test client

and i have the same problem

jtiai, i'm going try again

jtiai, http://sprunge.us/WmFyPC

Hobbestigrou: Could you please use dpaste.de in the future. That sprunge is terrible - it doesn't even have code highlight...

cryptopian: thanks :)

jtiai, http://sprunge.us/WmFyPC?python

still no line highlightning (which is really useful). But I don't see anything wrong so you need to pickup debugger and see why things go sideways.

I know that Django added session verification as a mandatory step in 1.10