#django

Has anyone the CDNlink from fontawesome present? http://fontawesome.io/get-started/

hello

I'm trying to test a view that does an order_by query but the queryset seems to be in a random order

and/or the files, that get a date from auto_now_add aren't in the correct date order

even if I sleep three seconds after objects.create I seem to sometimes get a queryset that doesn't match the date order

Lartza: is it a date or a datetime?

datetime field called date

:P

empedokles78: I didn't quite get your question. I tend to stick to rather standard fonts, unless I'm doing something that really requires something fancy

can you show the test and models?

Lynoure, it's an icon font cdn, but they only provide the link by mail for some reason: http://fontawesome.io/get-started/

knbk, https://dpaste.de/Pggs

empedokles78: ah, sorry, didn't notice that. I'm mostly using glyphicons via bootstrap, but it's a smaller set of icons

I'm pretty sure it's currently in wrong order in the test but it doesn't matter either way it fails sometimes and sometimes not

Lynoure, I see, they don't seem to work anymore with 4.0.

Oh and I also have a test like https://dpaste.de/M3PM that sometimes fails on assertnotcontains, sometimes on querysetequal, sometimes neither

empedokles78: that's indeed true, I'm still on Bootstrap 4 as I don't feel like being on beta for production stuff

oops, on Bootstrap 3

Was just about to say :P

I tend to use Foundation currently since it's flexgrid is not beta

also bootstrap 4 still seems alpha not beta

It's now beta I guess.

Oh yeah was looking at a wrong page

https://v4-alpha.getbootstrap.com/ is the first google result for bootstrap 4

:P

hrm, how do you route migrations when using docker? i'm thinking about adding one image that only does migrations, with a hardcoded hostname the router can detect

nku: why? docker exec -it <your_django> python manage.py migrate

question, I'm trying to serialize a model, that has got an attribute to it, is there some way to achieve this?

(e.g. l = Foo.objects.all(); [setattr(i, 'attr', i.parent.attr for i in l]; serializers.serialize('json', l)

Amnesia: look for SerializeMethodfield

and put your logic there

from django-rest ?

Amnesia: http://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/...

Amnesia: or you're not asking for rest framework help?

isn't there a way to do it with just django ? (without monkeypatching the serializer function)

no, I'm actually not:P

Amnesia: ah sorry

Amnesia: Im not familiar with that

no problemo

thanks nevertheless!

What do you guys use for CPU profiling? I tried Django Debug Toolbar/Panel, but the profiler overhead swamped my own code in the results and I couldn't tell what was actually slow...

Tried silk as well, but it seems to be broken. No CPU profile shown in the web UI, and when I dump the profile to a .prof, it shows *way* less time than my actual request used

Amnesia: so serializers.serialize('json', l) doesn't pick up every attribute of l?

if the profiler overhead is bigger than the performance of my own code, I just assume there is no performance problems

morenoh149: it only picks up the ones that are part of the model definition

AndreasLutro Well, a basic GET request for a single model is taking like 250ms+ so... there are definitely performance problems :-p

well, djdt will clear if it's not SQL problem at least

Amnesia: not sure, but maybe read http://devdocs.io/django~1.9/topics/http/sessio...

Fuyou yeah, I've found a few problematic queries already -- but supposedly they take much less time than I spend in python-space

I'm wondering if maybe I'm doing something wrong, though? Like, the profiler overhead appears to be about 1 second. That seems high to me.

And most of it is in some os/path method, checking something in the filesystem

I don't know why it'd be doing that.

I think djdt started having more problems than usually in recent Django versions

I saw a GitHub ticket about that. Although people were claiming it'd been fixed in the newest djdt... maybe not, though.