#django

then it process another batch of 6

and then bails

....

it missed that 20

unit923, I'm pretty sure order and filter conditions will solve your problem. Also, jump into paginator and see what's happening there, step by step. I'm pretty sure you'll see the source of confusion

thanks for that, i'm adding order by id now

order by id didnt help...

there's something weird going on here :)

ok thanks for that though; it cleared some stuff up though, i'll dig deeper

does anyone have experience in upgrading django 1.8 -> 1.9?

I'm sure it's widespread practice to import models in views, which in turn referenced by urlconf. I'm interested in how other peers have solved that problem

what is the way to add auto increment id while fectching record in django template

*display

k3rn3lwalk3r, you a model method when do necessary increment

and just call it from the template

didnt got you.

{% for data in Buildings %} (print record number ) (print record) {% endfor %}

i just want a veritable which increment every time record is fetched and i can print it in record number

i did that before now forgot how to do this

remembered it it was {{ forloop.counter }}

hello all. i've got a question regarding structuring the source of a djang project. is it considered good or bad practice to have one file per model?

*django

finster, it depends on you/the size of the project. I eventually did that when my project became big enough

or what I actually did was one file per "model and related models"

emacsen: ah, i see

finster, the other thing you may want to consider is if your project gets that big, splitting into multiple apps

i'm not there yet (splitting into multiple apps, that is)

emacsen: i like your nick ;

finster, thanks

any chance anyone can help me setting up celery with systemd?

celery.service: Failed at step CHDIR spawning /bin/sh: No such file or directory

but /bin/sh exists…..

finally got it to workkkk

hey guys, I'm kinda bad test writer and I need an advice :/

I have custom manage.py command, which downloads pretty big json data with requests

then, some particular data is extracted from json and stored in default db

and here comes the question - what should I test? I've already made tests which cover Command.handle() behaviour depending on optional argument

I also have some local test data (like 1/100000 of the original data) and there are tests which check if it's being stored in db correctly

anything else I should test, that comes to your minds, guys?

still nobody who did upgrade django 1.8 -> 1.9?

I'm sure lots of people did sima

in fact everyone who is on 1.8 and is now post 1.8 did

that's right. I've asked a question three times and nobody responded me :(

the question: I'm sure it's widespread practice to import models in views, which in turn referenced by urlconf. I'm interested in how other peers have solved that problem

and original question with more info: The problem stems from django's system check framefork and the fact that it does import urlconf on startup. This all happens during(or even before) apps registry is populated with models. And in views we heavily importing models. Right now I'm not sure how to proceed further: either disable all url-related checks or move models imports from views to ... - there's no answer where I could move those, and I'm very against do

ing all imports lazily, either inside views or deferring imports to actual usage time

hmm, I've never run into an issue like that

I assumed the system checks happen after the models are loaded

in fact I'm pretty sure they do

in fact, they have to

you can add system checks to models sima

orf_, hmm, not sure how that would happen. but thx for the hint, I need to verify that system check happen after models are loaded, and check why I've got different from that behavior

Damn, still no word about those tests I've asked before :(

Now I'm sad

dazm, don't be. life is good

daze6, I would also test how do you handle network failures

also, imo it's not a good idea to have manage.py doing such a job. rather another, separate management command/script

it is

I mean it is a command

I might have used wrong words before :-P

I use it like this "python manage.py <command name>"

sima: I went from 1.8 to 1.11 without problems for my (two) projects. I have all my imports at the top of each module.

vlt, hm. then I'll have to re-check that again, because I had not much time to investigate there. just spotted in traceback that the problem is happening after system checks do import urls. probably I've got wrong lane because of that initially. thx