#django

why is that?

less locking in the db and less connection overhead

setting atomic on particular views you mean?

yeah, only set atomic where you really need it and leave the rest in autocommit

OK, thx

well, my purpose originally is [for a in many_a: a.save()] [b.save() c.save()]

where [] is atomic

so a save()s uncoditionally and b, c only together. Am I doing it right?

depends on your requirements

if that's what you need, probably yes

a is tags. New tags should be created any way. Items ItemContainer and tag m2m binding should be created only together

otherwise my view is f***ed

that's one way of putting it :)

It's still view problem as well

but yeah, you can wrap stuff which should get created together in "with atomic"

That is how I did it

hm, it seems it was not my js which messed up

ripping image from remote site gives me preview on my page

it gets 403ed by remote

but if I copy link to my browser it loads

Fuyou: remote sites often block you

also security policies in the browser might be in effect

if I manually type http:// before image (remote) url it loads

I don't get what's going on

but http:// is in href ofc

loads now

Oo

Guess is that FF is messed up somehow, but ... oh, that Konqueror >.<

hm, no it's not FF problem

Konqueror doesn't load image to my page, but still I can view it

If remote server were blocking me (which would be plausible) how come I can urllib.read it ?

and I can see no pattern on how it gets or doesn't get displayed. Except that reloading my page has high probability it won't display even if did before

sry for offtop, but today is full of weird shit going on

I have JS-code with {% url %} tags in templates and now I want to put the code in an external file, what is good practice to not hard code the urls?

attach the URL to a DOM node, and have the JS ask for the value

[there's also a couple of packages which expose functions which return named urlconf patterns to JS, but I've never used any of them]

is python more faster and secure than php ?

was just curious

hi, i've got an IntegerField in my model, but when i make a for like that : for x in xrange(board.tailleX): it says an integer is required

when i print board.tailleX i've got u'7'

any idea ?

ok, u means unicode, i had to cast with int();

mattboll you doing something strange, if it's integerfield it should return integer values

hi

For camel case model names like class PersonType(models.Model) will this turn into my_app_person_type? Also is there a way to remove my_app_ for all models? Do I just set db_table='' in Meta?

Fuyou: yeah i know, i don't really understand why it was put as unicode, i get it with request.POST['sizeY'] and it comes from a select <option value={{i}}>{{i}}</option>

winmutt: no, db_table is literally the table name

mattboll_: request data is *always* strings

yeap, why you don't use django form?

This is why forms exist. So you can map crap request strings into real useful values

which would coerce it to int if set properly

hm, it seems my image display problem is with remote site scaling images

what is still weird as I considered that feature and fetch url from "original" link

huh, I declare remote site to be messed up. And my js not guilty. ^__^