mafintosh: the "local array of writers" could also be very useful as a base for something like branches
mafintosh
good point
Frando
mafintosh: basically like git does it. "local" being like "HEAD", a text file with a key
mafintosh: all actual writers would be in /peers, including local and source. and then the "local" and "source" files would just be aliases to these peers
mafintosh
Frando: yea and then multiple local writers just share the other feeds - sounds like the way to do it
Frando
mafintosh: and you could set the writer via opts { writer: key, secretKey: secretKey } on all method calls that do writing
mafintosh: exactky
mafintosh: should even be doable without a breaking change, as long as the on-disk layout is not required to be stable
mafintosh
Frando: yea i think that'd be doable. the layout isn't really defined anyware so i'd be ok with that. as long as it's backwards compat
Frando
mafintosh: cool then i'll look into that
some time, not a top prio but something i was thinkin about
mafintosh
sgtm
Frando has quit
xek_ has quit
owalsh_away joined the channel
owalsh_away has quit
Arsiesys17 joined the channel
Arsiesys17 has quit
dat-bot
(lzrski_gitlab) Hey, what are you using to chat? It seems that all messages are proxied by this `dat-bot` thing.