sjl: just got testing feedback from cogi – will you have a moment to review it before you take off today? I'd like to get any followup questions to them before end of day
sjl: see you just responded
sjl
deanjansen: so look at that before other tickets?
I think they've given us all they can
deanjansen
sjl: this should be considered a blocker
sjl: and since it'll take coordination w/ them, it's prob good to take care of asap
sjl
ok, make a ticket and set it as critical I guess
deanjansen
sjl: ok
sjl
janeted: I have no idea on the billing thing, it seems like the migrations have run. I'll look deeper into it after I take care of this cogi stuff
janeted
ok thanks sjl
sjl
janeted: actually the URL maggie mentioned as erroring out seems to work now
janeted: is it possible the migrations got run at some point since the last time someone checked it was broken?
janeted
I suppose anything is possible
i don't do that stuff
sjl
heh
janeted
anyway - it should have worked so you can mark as fixed again
sjl
well, it looks like the last time someone saw it error was 3 days ago, maybe it's been fixed now
janeted
and can just retest it - it was all fine on the demos and locally before
sjl
yeah I'll mark it as fixed, we've been deploying staging off and on so there's a good chance it was just the migrations
deanjansen: ah ok, I think I see the problem (or at least A problem)
deanjansen
sjl: cool
sjl
deanjansen: are we trying to maintain backwards compatibility at the API level, or are we having partners update their code?
deanjansen: basically the "language" parameter is now called "language_code"
deanjansen: so we can either have them send "language_code" or we can make our API accept both
deanjansen
sjl: I think we should maintain backwards compatibility, if it's not weird/crazy – we haven't really done anything to have them prep to update their API calls
sjl
yeah
oh nevermind, it has nothing to do with that, it's just a bug.