#docker-dev

estesp: for gh23084, how come you don't use `daemon.GetContainer`?

Optimize `docker ps` when name/id filters in use: https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/23084

thaJeztah didn't see this until now. Not introducing a feature in a point release makes perfect sense to me. However, justincormack's pr assumes seccomp is pulled / built in the Dockerfile, and without that happening binary builds will fail, which is big deal on power. Can we at least remove the tag, that should all the issues, without adding features and is a simple change I've done before. https://github.com/docker/docker/commit/31cc7dc...

47ef75b42c3f181

thaJeztah LMKWYT, and also thank you for being my liaison on this :)