i guess that means the backup sw doesnt do samba shares ?
sammie has quit
fss has quit
nope - i just don't know enough about where docker is going to decide if we should add vbox or not
given that brad is implementing something in the docker client
and that using -v /host:/container isn't portable
if I could set up a container that was a samba client, and declare the cifs mount point as a volue that would help too
but atm, the shared volume creats a new volume and so the dofs mount is lost
mostly, because -v bindmount is frowned upon, i look for solutions that assume it doesn't exist.
crosbymichael
maybe
we don't have top level volume management and it's too easy to delete a non running data container
SvenDowideit2
agreed - volumes need more lovin
dwalsh has quit
GregZ joined the channel
brainsprain joined the channel
GregZ has quit
GregZ joined the channel
brainsprain has quit
cpuguy83 joined the channel
junsuijin joined the channel
P0w3r3d has quit
jkingyens joined the channel
brainsprain joined the channel
vieux
crosbymichael: why did you switched from github handle to emails in pulls
?
b2dbot joined the channel
b2dbot
[boot2docker] SvenDowideit opened pull request #330: We need active maintainers (master...maintainers-update) http://git.io/B2doVA
b2dbot has left the channel
crosbymichael
vieux: shykes_ thought it is better because some ppl may not have a github account
SvenDowideit2
ok crosbymichael I've added a PR to make you a maintainer for both b2d and b2d-cli
cpuguy83 has quit
dlman joined the channel
cpuguy83 joined the channel
vmarmol_ has quit
cpuguy83 has quit
agoldste has quit
agoldste joined the channel
juztin_ joined the channel
JHop has quit
redbeard2 has quit
jpetazzo
crosbymichael: looks like I have to rebase anyway. have you merged your stuff yet? (just to know if I should start rebasing now, or wait until you've merged yours)
crosbymichael
yes
it's merged but shouldn't conflict
i didn't touch mount stuff
mainya joined the channel
stevedb joined the channel
jpetazzo
I ended up touching more stuff 🙂
erikh has quit
let's see if that's trivial rebase or what.
thanks!
agoldste has quit
agoldste joined the channel
mainya has quit
cpuguy83 joined the channel
mrunalp has quit
agoldste has quit
erikh joined the channel
buckaroo joined the channel
erikh has quit
erikh joined the channel
rogaha is now known as zz_rogaha
zz_rogaha is now known as rogaha
dstarnes joined the channel
dstarnes has quit
shykes_
crosbymichael: vieux : I just meant "let's not crash if the github handle is not specified", reall
dstarnes joined the channel
*really
vieux
ok
🙂
shykes_
but if github handle is going to be optional, then yeah it makes more sense to display the part that is not optional
vieux
I'm fine with it, it's just that my --maintainer pr take an email as argument
crosbymichael
i like the emails better anyways
shykes_
ah
vieux: we could have the filter match either one
vieux
yes but it was removed from the reviewer.go code completly crosbymichael ^
(I used 'pulls send' to send the pull request implement 'pulls send')
ok nevermind I found the bug
erkules has quit
jpetazzo
crosbymichael: I updated #gh5445. I still need help with tests but it's getting there (and let me know if it should be reshaped in any way. I'm getting more familiar with that part of the code so it won't be a big deal)
[docker] SvenDowideit opened pull request #5516: add page_description and page_keywords md meta to mkdocs html template (master...docs-meta-rendering) http://git.io/wf8ZBw